Why choose to use native Ethereum for gas on your Arbitrum chain
Choosing native Ethereum refers to configuring the chain to use ETH—the native currency of Ethereum—as the gas token for paying transaction fees. This is the default option in Orbit deployments, in contrast to selecting a custom ERC-20 token for gas. The choice is set during chain deployment via genesis parameters and is immutable afterward, directly impacting how users pay for gas and how operators handle revenue and costs.
Selecting native ETH means users must hold and spend ETH for all onchain activities, simplifying the fee mechanism without additional layers like token swaps or pricers. For operators, revenue is collected directly in ETH, which can be used seamlessly for data availability (DA) costs on the parent chain (e.g., posting to Ethereum).
This option prioritizes straightforward integration with Ethereum's ecosystem, avoiding complexities associated with custom tokens. It's ideal for chains where ETH is naturally used or where minimal operational overhead is desired, such as general-purpose rollups or those focused on DeFi interoperability with Ethereum.
Key Concepts
- Gas and Fees in Arbitrum: Gas measures computational work for transactions and executions, with fees equaling gas used times gas price. These cover sequencer operations, data posting to the parent chain (e.g., Ethereum), and network upkeep. In native
ETHsetups, all fees are denominated, paid, and settled inETH. - Native
ETHas Gas Token: The chain validates transactions against users'ETHbalances, deducting fees directly inETH. No token conversions are needed, aligning the chain's economics with Ethereum's standard model.
How Fees Are Handled
- Gas calculations and deductions occur directly in
ETHduring transaction processing. - No conversions or hedging are required for DA payments, as
ETHis the native asset on the parent chain. - Fees remain subject to
ETH's price volatility, which can affect user predictability.
Compatibility with Chain Types
- Works with all Orbit DA modes, including Rollup (posting to Ethereum), AnyTrust (DAC-based), and Alt-DA (e.g., Celestia), without restrictions.
- No special setup beyond standard deployment tools like the Orbit portal or scripts.
How It Differs from Custom Gas Tokens
- Custom Tokens: Fees are paid in an
ERC-20(e.g.,USDCor a project token), requiring users to hold that token instead ofETH. Operators must convert collected tokens toETHfor DA costs, which introduces volatility risks and necessitates mechanisms like pricer contracts for exchange rates. - Native
ETH: Eliminates conversions, swaps, and associated risks, but requires users to manageETHspecifically for gas, which may not align with app-specific ecosystems.
Pros
- Simplicity and Low Risk: No need for token conversions, hedging, or pricers, reducing operational complexity and economic losses from volatility.
- Seamless Ethereum Integration: Direct compatibility with Ethereum DA and broader tools, making it easier for
ETH-centric users and developers. - Predictable Revenue: Operators receive
ETHdirectly, usable without intermediaries.
Cons
- User Friction: Requires holding
ETHeven in ecosystems where it's not otherwise needed (e.g., gaming appchains), potentially complicating onboarding. - Limited Tokenomics: Doesn't create demand for project-specific tokens, missing opportunities for ecosystem utility or incentives like airdrops.
- Volatility Exposure: Fees in
ETHcan fluctuate with market prices, affecting user costs without stablecoin benefits.
Examples
- Standard Arbitrum chains like Arbitrum One use native
ETHfor broad Ethereum compatibility and simplicity. - In contrast, some Orbit chains opt for custom tokens like bridged
USDCfor stable fees, but nativeETHsuits projects prioritizing Ethereum alignment over custom economics.
This default choice emphasizes reliability and Ethereum-native operations within Arbitrum's modular framework. For deployment details, consult the official docs, or your RaaS; a list of RaaSes is on the Third-party providers page.